Get Money Out -Maryland

GMOM_letterhead_logo1234.jpg

Despite your record-setting efforts, the Democracy Amendment Resolution (DAR) did not get a vote in the 2017 General Assembly. A national organization is fighting us tooth and nail, and a key Delegate undermined our effort. Nevertheless, we did make progress in having access to and influence with leadership of the respective chambers, and we helped pass three bills on money in politics.

GMOM_HouseRules_031017.jpgSpecial News Flash! Wolf PAC founder Cenk Uygur will be in Washington, DC, this weekend in connection with the climate march. Cenk generated the idea of using the Article V Convention to get a Democracy Amendment for free and fair elections. His Young Turks network is the largest online news show in the world.

Saturday Event – 11am
WHAT: Climate March in D.C.
WHEN: Saturday 4/29 at 11am ET
WHERE: Intersection of Jefferson Dr SW & 3rd St SW, Washington, D.C.
Sunday Event – 12pm
WHAT: Resistance Rally
WHEN: Sun. 4/30, noon ET
WHERE: Busboys & Poets, 1025 5th St NW, Washington, D.C.
Cenk1.jpg

Good Bills That Passed

SB 130 by Sen. Bryan Simonaire – Prohibits a foreign principal from making a contribution or spending money to influence the outcome of a ballot issue.  simonaire.jpg
HB 898 by Del. Eric Ebersole – Defines “coordinated expenditure” to aid in enforcing the prohibition on coordination between campaigns and political parties, on the one hand, and dark money sources and so-called “independent spenders,” on the other hand. ebersole01.jpg
HB 1498 by Del. Alonzo Washington – Requires so-called “independent spenders” to identify a human being who lives in Maryland as resident agent and requires that individuals who violate the law on reporting campaign spending must pay the fines levied against them or be barred from future participation in influencing elections.  washington_a.jpg

Your Record-Setting Efforts for the Democracy Amendment Resolution in 2016-7

Our Education/Outreach Committee worked to create huge leaps in the number of GMOM speaking engagements and in the effectiveness of our social media presence

Our Legislative Committee secured support from Sen. Chris Van Hollen, Rep. Jamie Raskin, Rep. Elijah Cummings, Pastor Delman Coates, MD Conference NAACP, and the Chesapeake Climate Action network.

 Petitioning_Dona.jpg 2.958 petition signers for 2017 – 77% more than in the prior year.
 phonetalk1.jpg 3,200 new GMOM supporters (petition signers, callers, and others), equal to the total number recruited in the previous 3-1/2 years of our existence.
 pinsky.jpggaines.jpg 22 co-sponsors for Senator Paul Pinsky’s version of the DAR, SJ 4. 61 co-sponsors for Delegate Tawanna Gaines’ version, HJ 6.
 Busch_Miller.jpg  Senate Pres. Miller told 3 GMOM Board members that he supports the DAR. House Speaker Busch invited us to meet with him after the completion of the 2017 session.

So What the Heck Happened? Why Didn’t We Get a Vote on the DAR?

The Senate passed the DAR in 2015, and the Senate President does not want to devote further floor time to the DAR until the House initiates action. The House version – HJ 6 – did not get a vote because the leadership determined that discussion on the floor regarding the Article V convention process created an unfavorable atmosphere.

That discussion on the House floor arose over another resolution – HJ 2/SJ 2, which repealed Maryland’s prior applications for an Article V convention. The prior calls were passed between 1939 and 1975.[i] We supported that Resolution because we agree that actions taken between 42 and 78 years ago should not bind Maryland now and that “[t]he need to advance these various policy reforms should be debated anew.”

Unfortunately, Rules Committee Chair Anne Healey urged passage of this Repeal Resolution on the faulty grounds that a convention of the states would be dangerous and could lead to amendments that would damage individual citizens’ protections under the Bill of Rights.

ahealey.jpg

Her speech closely tracked the misleading talking points provided by Common Cause, which has obstructed efforts in many states to achieve the 28th Amendment using the Article V Convention process. Common Cause routinely fails to mention that any amendment proposed by a Convention would have to be ratified by three-fourths of the states – a formidable barrier to the enactment of an unwise amendment. Common Cause also implies that a “Constitutional Convention” could “enact” amendments. In fact, Article V permits “a Convention for proposing Amendments” (emphasis added), not a “Constitutional Convention.”

In taking that course, Del. Healey rejected a key element of the U. S. constitution – an element which was provided to protect citizens from an unresponsive or corrupt Congress. Del. Healey chooses to avoid directly confronting the forces supporting big money in politics on the basis that we should be afraid of them. You can listen to Del. Healey and her exchange with other delegates here. And you can hear GMOM volunteer Susan Ogden refute her points here.

Common Cause’s only strategy for winning an Amendment is to persuade Congress to propose it. We believe – and our supporters in the Congress confirm – that no progress will be made toward the 28th Amendment using a Congress-only path for the foreseeable future. In addition, the appointment of Justice Gorsuch means that the Supreme Court will not be overruling itself any time soon on campaign finance matters.

Get Money Out believes strongly in pursuing both paths laid out in Article V of the Constitution to build support for the 28th Amendment. To do otherwise is to ask citizens to fight voter suppression and big money in politics with one hand tied behind our backs. Click here for our full explanation of why we reject the “runaway convention” theory and other fear-based opposition to the full use of Article V.


[i] “These calls include: (1) House Resolution (1939) (unconfirmed) calling for limitations on the federal taxing power; (2) House Joint Resolution 40 (1964) calling for standards concerning the size and boundaries of congressional districts; (3) Senate Joint Resolution 1 (1965) calling for legislative autonomy concerning the apportionment of State legislative bodies; (4) Senate Resolution 47 (1973) (unconfirmed), a memorial from the Senate of Maryland calling for the allowance of school prayer in public schools; and (5) Senate Joint Resolution 4 (1975) calling for a balanced federal budget. It is generally believed that these calls never expire, and current generations are now bound by decisions made in a different time and culture. The need to advance these various policy reforms should be debated anew, and not bind future generations without any consideration. . . .”

Charlie
http://www.getmoneyoutmd.org/

Human Rights Are Key to Saving the Planet

Human Rights Are Key to Saving the Planet 

SC stands with immigrantsImmigrants’ rights partners are organizing nationwide rallies on May 1 to support immigrants and resist Trump’s deportation machine. At our partners’ invitation, the Sierra Club is supporting the rallies to make clear that a broad, diverse movement stands united in resisting Trump’s anti-immigrant policies. The day of action is part of a coordinated weekend of resistance that includes the People’s Climate March on April 29. Two days after you show up to protest Trump’s attacks on our climate take a stand against Trump’s attacks on immigrant families, who often disproportionately bear the brunt of climate change. Find a rally happening near you!

Submitted by Stan Boyd, Justice Chair

MD Pollinator Habitat law passed the MD General Assembly!

Thanks to the leadership and hard work Maryland Pesticide Education Network Maryland is protecting our health, our food, and our pollinators! MD Pollinator Habitat law passed the MD General Assembly.

With deep gratitude for our champions in the MD General Assembly : Bill Sponsors Del. Healey and Sen. Nathan-Pulliam; Senate Education & Environmental Affairs Committee Chair & Vice Chair, Sen. Joan Carter-Conway & Sen. Pinsky; House Environment & Transportation Committee Chair and Vice Chair Del. Barve & Del. Stein, and 2016 Habitat law sponsor, Del. Lafferty. 

Freedom of Speech discussions with Georgetown President John J. DeGioia

0307171206_HDR‘Polarized debates pushed the bounds of American civil discourse during Election 2016. College campuses — long intended as bastions of freedom of speech for teachers and students alike — were and will continue to be in the thick of the political and ideological disagreement. For college administrators trying to maintain freedom of speech and an inclusive academic environment, the divided campus climate presents a diplomatic challenge: to ensure that people of all perspectives feel able to contribute to the discussion, regardless of how far outside of the college mainstream they may be- How can administrators protect voices from all sides of the debate, even as disagreements in other parts of the country turn ugly? How can colleges find peace through civility while maintaining healthy debate?  In a ‘We The People’ conversation, Georgetown University President John J. DeGioia (Jack)  joins The Atlantic’s Steve Clemons to discuss what free speech on campus means today. ‘ Please find more details here on the Freedom of Speech discussions with Georgetown President John J. DeGioia

MUPJ members joined the Cheverly Women’s Club at the American Legion on February 12th, 2017, to celebrate Black History month and African American history of standing up for change.

snapshotg14MUPJ members joined the Cheverly Women’s club at the American Legion in Cheverly on February 12th, 2017 to celebrate Black History month and African American history of standing up for change. At the diverse group of gathering of  people, there were many activities.  There were arts paintings and exhibition depicting the history and culture of African American History, African music band and lots of food. Participants read chapters from Martin Luther King’s ‘I have a dream’ speech to re-invoke the spirit of  African American Civil Rights Movement, and the fight and struggles for justice, and the story of the Black History month from as far back as the 1915.

lyon3g5During Open Mic, participants  read poems,shared personal experiences, prayed and spoke passionately of hope for a country that will embrace all and sundry regardless of race, religion or background, and continue to serve as a shiny example to the world. 

The diverse speakers spoke out against racism and to improve conditions for African Americans and others like refugees who face glaring discrimination and injustice. Many other speakers from interfaith groups and those who work for peace, justice, education spoke at the event.

g1 snapshot02222The Launching of a book by Stewart Calvin Stevens Sr (the chandeliers ) together with her daughter was one of the major highlights of the event. Steven Stewart cleaned the windows, the doors and the chandeliers at the White House , and often a lot more for more than three decades, and an opportunity to meet 7 US presidents at the time during his humble service. He  got a crystal-clear look at history, ‘and when he was done cleaning, Stewart would occasionally slip out of his blue work clothes and into a tuxedo to check coats for those attending state dinners’.

Stewart who  retired from his White House duties as a Chandelier in 2002, has his vivid mementos and his memories to serve as a reminder of how much of the nation’s history was made by ordinary men and women whose lives intersected with extraordinary events. It was great to recognize that like many unsung contributions to society, Stewart’s story highlighted the role African Americas played in the positive transformation of society .

From the many speakers, it was easy to realize that many African Americans added an intellectually diverse landscape of ideas to solve racism and oppression, and used their education to overcame racism that marginalized them within  the society during the time.

snapshot0sdsdThe event further provided an opportunity to hear first-hand from some of those who participated in the Civil Rights Movement and who added to the  vibrant voices and became part of the chorus of American freedom, justice and independence.

 

 

dr-martin-luther-king-jrBy acknowledging the role Martin Luther King and others played in contributing to the warp and woof of American history, culture and character, the Black History Month further reminds us of the importance of courage and sacrifice for the common good of humanity, and challenging America to embrace justice and equality for all .

 

 

g9Cheverly women’s Club.   “We hope that you will become an active part of the Cheverly Woman’s Club and help us grow seeds of peace in Cheverly, its surroundings and the world. We’re working on building “Beloved Community” and ask you to join us. If you’re already involved, we thank you and ask you to continue.” – Joyce Lang

Contributed By: Andrew Greene MUPJ 2017

Kevin Martin, President of national Peace Action Talks about Creating a Beloved Community based on Peace and Social Justice in the current era

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

On February the 12th, MUPJ hosted Guest Speaker Kevin Martin, the President of national Peace Action. Kevin spoke about ‘Creating a beloved community based on Peace and Social Justice in the current era. He also discussed the possibility of MUPJ becoming the statewide affiliate or associate of Peace Action. He  described what a statewide affiliate or associate is, and what it would mean for MUPJ and for the Maryland peace movement. The event took place on Sunday February 12, 2017 at Adelphi Friends, during MUPJ’s Organizational Meeting.

Please watch  this space for more updates about issues.

Evaluation Training

Evaluation Training organized by Nonprofit Prince George’s County

MUPJ at Evaluation Training
January IDEAS & INFO Luncheon:

Dr. Taj Carson and the team from Carson Research Consulting presented a workshop on program evaluation. The workshop met its goals in providing participants with the understanding of what process and outcome measures are.  The workshop further offered best practices for measurement and data collection.   The workshop raised several questions for organizations to re-examine their impact. How does your organization measure impact? ‘You say your program works, but why should I believe you? Are your staff and board members aware of your programs’ effectiveness? Are potential funders able to see the results of your most popular programs?
The workshop further corroborates the importance of Program evaluation, and why “it is essential for nonprofits to gauge social impact, and organizations large and small have the ability to conduct them”.
According to Dr. Taj Carson of Carson Research Consulting (CRC) , organizations, funders, donors use evaluations for an array reasons.

To ensure investments are making the desired impact. 

To determine future investments. 

To demonstrate efficient use of resources.

To engage with grantees about program work and possible improvements.

The event took place on Wednesday, January 11, 2016 From 12 Noon – 2:30 pm At the Vista Gardens Marketplace 10201 Martin Luther King. Jr. Highway  Second Floor Community Room A  Bowie, MD 20720

Why Evaluation? The importance of evaluation is to improve the organization, increase effectiveness of management and administration, objectively assess performance, address problems related to cost, recognize and understand secondary or unanticipated effects, program replication and marketing, to meet accountability requirements.

STRATEGIC THINKING
One of the first presenters of the Workshop Dr. Taj Carson, has done 14 years of Evaluation work with Data of all types. She works participants through the format of the workshop and says she wants to make it interactive. She described the five steps cycle of Program Planning and Evaluation.
She listed the following five steps of Program Planning and Evaluation:
 Step 1. Conduct needs assessment  Step 2. Define goals and objectives  Step 3. Design and implement Research-based activities.  Conduct Evaluation(s)  Step 5. Report and use Evaluation Findings.

She reiterated the importance for organizations to consider evaluation as a key to their success. It is important to therefore conduct Program Evaluation as an essential part of a grant that your  organization has received, or to provide a clear idea to your Board and provide answers about outcomes, or to also let your  staff become clear about the effectiveness of  a particular program.
The facilitator also went on to say that ‘evaluation is critical whether organizations are planning a new project or starting a program from the ground up, re-working an existing project or program to make it more effective, or trying to make sense of findings from previous evaluations, the Evaluation method is critical in helping organizations get off the ground in their current environment and a formal needs assessment.
She mentioned and explained the various types of evaluation methods which are the Process Evaluation, which is used for the following.
 Used to measure the activities of the program, its quality and who it is reaching. (Has the project reached the right group?)  have all the activities being implemented as intended and what happens afterwards if it is not?   All information and materials suitable for the target market? She mentioned that in program planning, and outcome, things sometimes don’t happen the way they are planned or intended like how one expects projects to be. There should be internal conversation with staff
and reassess the program as well with program beneficiaries.
The Outcome Evaluation is concerned with the long term effects of the program. This process addresses the critical question of whether the overall program goals have been achieved. And if the goals were not achieved, what factors have contributed or hindered the desired change. Some dynamics of the program may change due to shift in needs or unexpected changes in the environment. There should be formal needs assessment about the quality of the program and the number of people who are asked about their experiences of program impact and their feedback and evaluation helps.
Defining Goals
The workshop facilitator says every organization should first of all have goals they need to reach and it is important to ‘defining these goals and objectives’. She described goals as “overarching statements of what the program hope to accomplish. Goals may vary depending on the work you do or resources needed. There are small programs with a specific focus might conceivably have one goal, whilst a more complex or broader program may have multiple goals. The facilitator drew the participants attention to a workforce development program’s goals which she says might include:
Examples of goals include:
 Help clients reduce their barriers to employment  Help clients become job ready  Increase client’s economic self-esteem.
 Evaluation Training          organized by Nonprofit Prince George’s County

She says that in writing measurable goals, organizations should also consider the ‘who, what and when’. Who refers to the target audience, ad what will refer to the nature of that needs, and when the timeline to meet these needs. It is important to write reasonable goals and consider the following points.
 Audience – Who? The population/target audience for whom the desired impact/outcome is intended.   Behavior – What? A clear statement of the behavior change/results expected  Condition – when? Under what condition will it happen.
The facilitator asked participants to give examples of objectives eg. Providing access to job training’.
She mentioned the common mistakes that organizations should avoid when writing goals and objectives. These include
 Stating activities as goals  Stating implementation or operational benchmarks as goals  Writing compound goals as objectives.
She admonished organizations that whilst they are in need of the grants, they must not be swayed by what the funders want them to do but to stick to what you are good at so that you can better deliver and reach your goals.
Logic Models
The importance of Logic Model in program evaluation was also discussed. The facilitator expressed that ‘everyone has a theory about the impact that their programs have or will have on the people in the community, but wouldn’t you want to know why your program is expected to have an impact?  That’s where logic models come in. Logic models help lay out the chain of causation that stakeholders often look for. Why will a certain strategy work? How will this new strategy affect the program as a whole? Organizations need to develop these tools in order for the need to properly plan their programs and improve them for grant applications, evaluation, and strategic decision-making.
The illustration above shows the basic Logic model format which includes ‘Your Planned Work’ and ‘Your Intended work’.
Logic models ‘Allow us to show connections among program components’ show how program activities will lead to the accomplishments of objectives, and how accomplishing objectives will lead to the fulfillment of goals.

Participants went through an exercise of the Graphical Model (elevation pitch) which is a great way to share what your program is doing via graphics.
Participants also were asked to develop their ‘list of outcomes which are the results of program operations or activities’. An example of a work place development program may include:  Clients having reduced barriers to success, Clients access and completed job-training programs
Organizations also need to research, evaluate their programs often and analyze data understand the needs of their program and address the challenges they face in the tasks ahead. It is also significant that organizations can share or tell what their impact has been and how to demonstrate their worth to others, by ensuring that they communicate their findings in a proper manner or in way that makes sense to funders, donors or partners.
Data Collection and Analysis
The world of evaluation and data collection evolves as technology improves and needs change and so it is important to look out for new changes.
The second facilitator and presenter was Sarah McCruden who is also from the CRC. She says that  ‘We love data’! but data is expensive and cost money so it is important to save and store data and collect as much data as possible whilst looking at indicators every two years. Eg if an organization has added new funders to their list, that needs to be included in their data. Sarah says that Data is important depending on your organization’s needs. In choosing data, organizations can select and design surveys, implement the most appropriate data collection methods, conduct interviews, or compile existing data within your organization. There is need to collect data through surveys and provide survey results, focus groups, needs assessments.
She mentioned the quantitative and qualitative data analysis, including use of SPSS, Excel, and ATLAS.ti. software packages tools to gather data. Qualitative data she says, ‘involve interviews and it is good to bring in researchers too or consultants who understand the background of those you are collecting data from. Universities can provide graduate students as interns who already have experiences in using data software to help organizations provide quality data and useful data with fewer expenses from the organization. There are also Google services, Google drive, Microsoft tools (Office Suite) and survey monkeys some of which are free and others can be upgraded with fees’.

While we think data is fun on its own, we know that you have goals you need to reach, so you need to be able to access and use it.
Organizations must be able to generate and use evaluation findings, design programs, and use data for outcome-based assessments and to show funders how their support has the desired measuring impact through your work.  Data when used effectively will help organizations access resources and secure the funding they need and to communicate your project or program’s impact to different audiences successfully.
Sarah also mentioned the importance of using Dashboards in Data Collection as part of several data tools.

The use of dashboard at the close of organization’s research and evaluations is important as organizations may have collected a huge volume of data that needs to be accessed. Organizing these data is important and the tools with dashboard  to combine new data with data you already stored can be done with dashboard to straighten tables, graphs and  so that they are interpreted correctly and updated constantly. The use of dashboards helps in the dynamic data collection. She mentioned that easily accessed online, so you can answer questions about your program, school, agency, or other organization quickly and knowledgeably.
Dashboards also allow organizations to use multiple visual elements to explain the benefits of your programs and communicate findings clearly. And they’re easy to update.
Database Management And Reporting
Data management and reporting is therefore key and so designing and building  or managing it needs such software like  ‘Efforts to Outcomes (ETO) and Microsoft Access  which are popular software .

By: Andrew Greene MUPJ 2017

Corporate Funding

Ideas & Info Luncheon & Annual Meeting Corporate Funding

Nonprofit Prince George’s County10201 Martin Luther King Jr.

2nd Floor Conference Rm. A Bowie, MD 20720
The Nonprofit Prince George’s County hosted the workshop entitled “Ideas & Info Luncheon & Meeting Corporate Funding on October the 12th 2016 at the Vista Garden’s Market Place in Bowie, MD. The Nonprofit Prince Georges which has as its goals ‘to  improve the effectiveness of nonprofits serving Prince George’s County by providing information and training, advocacy, networking and collaboration opportunities’, hosted the workshop in order to provide ideas  and resources to nonprofit leaders on ways to approach funding.
The luncheon and Ideas workshop room was packed with several nonprofit professionals and nonprofit leaders who were keen to hear and learn about best practices in fund-raising from the two presenters: Tracye Funn, Corporate Contributions Manager for Washington Gas and Tami Watkins, Senior External Affairs Specialist at PEPCO.
Maryland United for Peace and Justice MUPJ  http://www.mupj.org
The presenters were Tracye Funn, Manager, Corporate Contributions, Washington Gas and Tami Watkins, Senior External Affairs Specialist, PEPCO.
Maryland United for Peace and Justice MUPJ  http://www.mupj.org

Whilst a lot of nonprofit funding comes from the donations of individuals, it is also true that private funding and private partnerships can also help tremendously in supporting the work and efforts of organizational fundraising and program goals.
Both Fun and Waltkins discussed several strategies for private funding proposals, whilst each panelist shared specific insights on the various ways their Companies provide charitable giving opportunities to non-profits in search of funding opportunity.
Funn suggested that when Non-profits are looking for funding and considering submitting application for Washington Gas, an organization should “consider the current economic trends because we want immediate impact with community concerns.” She also maintained that ‘organizations must send specific pages as requested or needed, and so it is important to make research of the web, and also call the grant giving company or organization beforehand’. She emphasized the need for organizations to “call the Grant Manager ahead of time and send a one page concept papers”. She asked the question; “What are the greatest barriers to securing funding”?  and engaged the participants in an interactive session on challenges to secure funding.
Maryland United for Peace and Justice MUPJ  http://www.mupj.org

One participant raised the concern for ‘time constrains’ as it can be a barrier, whilst another suggested that ‘programmatic areas’ or areas of focus of the funding can often be a barrier to funding.  Andrew Greene from MUPJ suggested also that ‘eligibility criteria can be a barrier to getting grants as grants can have specific geographical scope or specific areas of focus’.
The presenter Funn also suggested that ‘reading all the criteria to make sure your organization is a fit is important’. She goes on to say that ‘Knowing the timeframe and your community you wish to support is vital for seeking support as well as the audience you plan to reach’. She further emphasized that ‘when writing proposals applicants should know that dollar amount must be commensurate to your work’ and they ‘encourage volunteers in organizations’. She encouraged participants to present proposals with volunteer efforts in mind. ‘Organizations should ensure that volunteers have to be within specific budget when writing grants as we value volunteer efforts in grant requests. Project leaders should therefore submit something that covers volunteers’.
In answer to MUPJ’s representative Andrew’s questions about bringing in new ideas, Funn affirmed that their funding is not just restricted to their own ideas and she turned to her colleague panelist  Waltkins nodding and saying  “we also look for new ideas. New for us will be good.”
They are interested in Public private partnership, and the idea of a partnership was a new concept. ‘New ideas are great but for immediate funding needs, the new idea will take some time for the company to familiarize with it, so it is better to understand what the company funds if organizations are looking for a quicker and immediate path to funding’. She expressed.
Funn added that ‘organization leaders need to be in search of and know where the people who give funding are and so go for it and research. It is also important to know what is critical for your organization’.   She asked the question “What is your pitch?”, and suggests that your pitch is “the way you connect with people, the way you say it, and so be mindful of what you say, know your worth and value, and be authentic. And this will pay off”.
She expressed the great need for organizations to take a bold step and reach-out to private and public funders and to make use of several resources such as volunteers, which can help in cutting down cost on workload and to value the work of volunteers and include their services and needs in budgets when writing grants. She said ‘some resources that seem even small are vital like individuals who provide access to printing materials for the organizations work’. She ask that leaders should know where to go to see the changes being made by corporate funding bodies and charitable giving companies or groups, and evaluate your program so that way you can raise more cash.
Tami Watkins from the company Pepco, shared other benefits their company PEPCO offers, which include free use of the PEPCO Edison Gallery for workshops, Board meetings and events in their office in DC. Both presenters noted that their websites provide excellent resources for
Maryland United for Peace and Justice MUPJ  http://www.mupj.org

funding and grants applications can be sent online. Tami emphasized that organizations meet the 501c 3 criteria and have to be registered in the MD, DC area. Watkins encouraged nonprofit leaders to ‘always ask PEPCO for what you need’ and says that ‘corporate dollars are the bigger funding at the excellent level’. She also gave a background about their companies and encouraged participants to check their website which deals with ‘Energy Efficiency’ where they have million customers. Their company also encourages organizations to show how they have benefited from their company by acknowledging them in their activities as sponsors, their logos on their flyers and postal and websites as well as social media to indicate that they don’t just give cash but build relationship with organizations.
Whilst the proposal format for funding request from the two companies will vary, both speakers from Washington Gas and PEPCO shared the following similar tips to assist with organizations and non-profit meet their funding goals.  1)    Look at the website for proposal guidelines.  2)    Put in the request in advance. 3)    Be creative and flexible about the request. 4)    If your request is denied, contact the program manager to learn why. 5)    Be authentic  6)    Build relationship with the funding partners and corporate bodies.
http://www.MUPJ.org

By: Andrew Greene

Our mission:

 MUPJ will bring together organizations and individuals from across Maryland to build relationships and make meaningful progress towards peace and justice.  

Our vision:

 Our purpose is to:

1. promote coordination and networking

2. facilitate cooperation among peace and justice organizations and individuals on issues of common concern

3.  encourage and support nonviolent means of resolving problems and conflicts

4. promote education and action for peace, justice and democracy and a healthy environment by members and the public 

5. encourage members’ participation and sharing in decision-making and leadership.